The Khalan language, or Mavakhalan (Mavakhalan: mavaxalan [ˈmaβaxalan]) was the language spoken in the city-state of Khalan (Mavakhalan: xalan, Adāta: khalanu) approximately 800 years after the birth of Zārakātias. The empire of Athalē was on the verge of collapse, and the citizens were eager to return to their principles of isonomy and promoted the use of the local dialect as separatist symbol in all aspects of life: literature, debate, trade and religion.
Contents |
The distinguishing characteristic of Mavakhalan phonology was the systematic ±palatal contrast in the consonantal system. The first table below shows the surface consonant inventory, with purely allophonic phones bracketed. The second table shows the underlying phonemic inventory, with the plain and palatalised consonants paired together. Note that palatalised consonants will be denoted elsewhere in the text by the plain consonant followed by the palatalisation marker, so /tʲ/ is equivalent to /tɕ/.
labial | dental | alveolar | postalveolar | alveolopalatal | palatal | velar | glottal | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
nasals | m · mʲ | n | ɲ | |||||
plosives | p · pʲ | t | c | k | ||||
(b · bʲ) | (d) | (ɟ) | (ɡ) | |||||
affricates | tɕ | |||||||
(dʑ) | ||||||||
fricatives | ɸ · ɸʲ | θ | s | ʃ | ɕ | ç | x | h |
β · βʲ | ð | z | ʒ | ʑ | ʝ | ɣ | ||
liquids | l | ɹ | ɹʲ | ʎ | ||||
semivowels | w | j |
labial | dental | alveolar | velar | glottal | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
nasals | m · mʲ | n · ɲ | |||
plosives | p · pʲ | t · tɕ | k · c | ||
fricatives | ɸ · ɸʲ | θ · ɕ | s · ʃ | x · ç | h · (ç) |
β · βʲ | ð · ʑ | z · ʒ | ɣ · ɟ | (ɣ) · (ɟ) | |
liquids | l · ʎ | ɹ · ɹʲ | |||
semivowels | w | j |
oral | front | central | back |
---|---|---|---|
close | i | u | |
mid-close | e | o | |
mid-open | ɛ | ɔ | |
open | a |
nasal | front | central | back |
---|---|---|---|
close | |||
mid-close | |||
mid-open | ɛ̃ | ɔ̃ | |
open | ɑ̃ |
The syllable structure of Mavakhalan required exactly one vowel in a syllable and permitted initial and final consonant clusters of up to two terms. Consonant clusters of up to three terms arose at the juncture of two syllables, or if the third term was a liquid such as /l lʲ ɹ ɹʲ/, for example, /sʲkɹeɔɹɑ̃/ for the cunning.
/i/ and /u/ were almost always never found immediately preceding another vowel: a glide /j w/ was usually inserted. /wu/ did not occur, though [ji] may have occurred when /ɣi/ is preceded by a vowel other than /i/.
Mavakhalan had dynamic accent and was stress-timed. The lexical stress of Adāta was more-or-less preserved, though loss of some short vowels had required the stress to move to adjacent syllables. Stress in Mavakhalan was also fixed: inflection did not cause stress to move.
In this article, a phonetic romanised transcription scheme will be used.
A vowel following a palatalised consonant is written with a preceding j unless the vowel is /i/. The apostrophe after the consonant is deleted in that case; note that the mark on ď ľ ť are not apostrophes, but carons. A consonant cluster with /j/ is distinguished from a palatalised consonant by inserting ъ between the consonant and j.
Hence, /mʲemʲ/ is transcribed mjêmʼ, /aβʲβɔ/ is avʼvo, /tʲa/ is ťja and /pja/ is pъja.
Like its relative Ayāsth, Mavakhalan morphology was characterised by the presence of both prefixing and suffixing morphology. However, in comparison to Ayāsth, Mavakhalan morphophonology was considerably simpler, in part because the complex system of consonantal and vocalic mutations did not exist in Mavakhalan. As with Ayāsth, this article will use the terms capital inflection and caudal inflection to refer to prefixing and suffixing morphology, respectively.
A Mavakhalan noun may take several prefixes and suffixes, but there was a strict order to the morphemes:
The capital declension classes are:
A note about nouns beginning with a liquid consonant (one of /l lʲ ɹ ɹʲ/): these behave like vocalic capital stems if, in Adāta, the first syllable contained a strong vowel; if it had a weak vowel then the behaviour would be similar to those of initial waw consonantal capital stems, but without the addition of /β/.
The caudal declension classes are simply divided according to the last vowel of the stem, if any. Note that consonantal stems may or may not have a final consonant in the construct case, for example, la has the stem las-, and oðą has the stem oðan-. There are, however, two classes of stems in /ɔ/, which originate from Adāta stems ending in */aː/ and */o/.
Additionally, nouns were divided into two genders: animate and inanimate (or neuter). Animate nouns were marked for postpositional case, but inanimate nouns were not.
There was only one case marked in this position, the genitive:
str. c. | cons. | str. n. | weak n. | voc. | w-voc. | w-cons. | j- | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Genitive | a- | aġ- | axô- | ax- | ać- | i.e. of ... |
Mavakhalan inherited the collective plural prefix *ā- from Adāta, which had been generalised into a simple plural as well as a semiproductive derivational prefix. The two may be distinguished by number concord - a collective noun may take singular prefixes and suffixes, but not a plural noun.
The singulative was also inherited from Adāta, as a derivational suffix -s. The interaction between this suffix and the stem was somewhat more complex than the other suffixes due to the fact that this suffix is consonant initial. Consonantal caudal stems have to be further subdivided into:
-s was usually suffixed to a collective noun formed with o-, but this was not necessarily the case: for example, the noun žzakalas (citizen, subject of the king) is derived from the singular žzakala (kingdom).
Although Adāta had no definite or indefinite articles, Mavakhalan developed a new definite article from the distal demonstrative *si, and a nullar article from the quantifier *mi. However, the short vowel /i/ was prone to weakening and at some stage the two were reanalysed as a proclitics. At that point, the collective plural prefix *ā- was reanalysed as an indefinite article, leading to the development of the following article system:
str. c. | cons. | str. n. | weak n. | voc. | w-voc. | w-cons. | j- | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Indefinite sg | Ø- | i.e. a ... | |||||||
Indefinite pl | o- | ow- | ov- | oj- | nouns beginning with /a ɔ/ drop the /a ɔ/, hence ovą not **oavą, and of not **oof. | ||||
Definite sg nom | śjê- | ś- | ź- | śjê- | śj- | św- | śjêv- | śij- | i.e. the ...; śij- becomes śi- before a consonant. |
Definite pl nom | śjê- | ś- | śjêg- | śkô- | śk- | śjek- | śjêč- | ||
Definite sg acc | śją- | śjên- | źnô- | źn- | śjên- | śjêň- | |||
Definite pl acc | śi- | śje- | śij- | śiw- | śiǵ- | śij- | nouns beginning with /i/ drop the /i/, hence śizô not **śiizô. | ||
Nullar nom | mjê- | mʼ- | mʼ- | mjê- | mj- | mʼw- | mjêv- | mij- | i.e. none of ...; mij- becomes mi- before consonants; may not cooccur with any demonstrative or quantifier, takes singular agreement. |
Nullar acc | mją | mjên- | mʼn- | mʼn- | mjên- | mjêň- |
conson. | -ê | -e | -a/-o | -o | -ô | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1sg | -ej | -êj | -ej | -oj | -ej | -ôej | i.e. my ... |
2sg | -oðo | -êoðo | -eoðo | -oðo | -oðo | -ôðo | i.e. your ... |
3sg | -aka | -êaka | -eka | -oka | -oka | -ôaka | i.e. his/her/its ...; not used with inanimate possessors. |
1pl | -ei | -êi | -ei | -oi | -ei | -ôei | i.e. our ... |
2pl | -olov | -êolov | -eolov | -olov | -olov | -ôlov | i.e. your ... |
3pl | -ako | -êako | -eko | -oko | -oko | -ôako | i.e. their ...; not used with inanimate possessors. |
For animate nouns, nominative and accusative case could be marked by a suffixed morpheme in addition to a declined determiner; on the other hand, no such distinctions were made on inanimate nouns: the determiner was the sole marker of case.
This was most likely due to the development of these case suffixes from a cliticised form of the 3sg and 3pl pronouns. This hypothesis would also explain the unusual morphosyntactic behaviour of complex noun phrases, where these morphemes are not suffixed onto the head noun, but onto the last genitive phrase. For example, śjamezeka ažzaka akoxaðą, not **śjamezekǫ ažzaka akoxað.
Note that the allomorphy depends on the vowel the suffix is adjacent to, not the vowel of the stem, hence, keloją, not **kelojǫ.
conson. | -ê | -e | -a/-o | -ô | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Construct | -Ø | -ê | -e | -a / -o | -ô | |
Nominative sg | -a / -Ø | -ê | -e | -a / -o | -ô | |
Accusative sg | -ą | -êą | -ę | -ǫ | -ôą | |
Nominative pl | -o / -Ø | -ê | -e | -a / -o | -ô | |
Accusative pl | -o | -êo | -eo | -o | -ô |
Pronouns and determiners were both roughly equivalent to nouns in terms of syntax, though morphologically they differed from nouns in some respects.
nom sg | acc sg | nom pl | acc pl | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1sg / 1pl | jê | ję | i | ijo | |
2sg / 2pl | ðo | ðǫ | loxo | loxô | |
3sg / 3pl | a | ą | o | o | |
1pl singulative | jês | jêsą | ojês | ojêso | |
2pl singulative | loxos | loxosą | oloxos | oloxoso | |
3pl singulative | as | asą | os | oso | |
Interrogative | xezo | xezǫ | oxezo | oxezo | who |
Demonstrative pronouns (inanimate) | |||||
Proximal | zêje | ozêje | this, these | ||
Mesial | xexe | oxexe | that, those | ||
Distal | sêje | osêje | that yonder, those yonder | ||
Interrogative | xeza | oxeza | what | ||
Demonstratives | |||||
Proximal | zê | zę | za | zo | this, these |
Distal | xa | xą | xa | xo | that, those, yonder |
Interrogative | za | zą | za | zo | which; is yod-initial, i.e. takes the genitive prefix ać-. |
Quantifiers | |||||
Paucal | fa | fą | i.e. few of ...; may itself take a definite article or a demonstrative; takes plural agreement. | ||
Plural | ofa | ofą | i.e. many of ...; may itself take a definite article or a demonstrative; takes plural agreement. | ||
Partitive | name | namę | name | namę | i.e. some ...; may not take a definite article or a demonstrative; takes singular agreement if uncountable, plural agreement otherwise. |
Exhaustive | eze | ezę | eze | ezę | i.e. all of ...; may not take a definite article or a demonstrative; takes singular agreement if uncountable, plural agreement otherwise. |
Distributive | or | or | i.e. every ...; may not take a definite article or a demonstrative; takes singular case agreement; may stack with other quantifiers. |
Adjectives in Mavakhalan are indeclinable, however, zero-derivation produces deadjectivial inanimate nominals, which are declinable, even if not for nominative and accusative case. Affirmative adverbs are formed with the instrumental preposition ate, and negative adverbs are formed with the abessive preposition al. Superlative nominals are formed by compounding with jêm-, which is prefixed onto the genitive of the deadjectivial noun.
For example:
Both ordinal and cardinal numbers in Mavakhalan behave as adjectives. Ordinal numbers are formed by prefixing l- or lъ- or lô- to the number, or the first element of the number phrase. Simple compounding is used to form the numbers from 1 to 99; higher numbers are formed by stringing together number words with the conjunction -ǫ-, for example, ftuxęť-ǫ-ňľjêfʼ-ǫ-êrôv for 4964, which may be pronounced ftuxęťj-oňľjêfj-onêrôv) in rapid speech.
Cardinal | Ordinal | +10 | ×10 | ×100 | ×1000 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | ma | the nullar article is more commonly used. | |||||
1 | ke | lge | rôke | (ke)ro | (kê)jêfʼ | ketuxęť | |
2 | ja | lъja | rôja | jaro | jejêfʼ | jatuxęť | |
3 | zô | lzô | rôzô | zôro | zôjêfʼ | zôtuxęť | |
4 | vôv | lôv | rôv | vro | vъjêfʼ | ftuxęť | vôv may be abbreviated to v, ôv or (j)êv in rapid speech. |
5 | ðô | lðô | rôðô | ðôro | ðôjêfʼ | ðôtuxęť | |
6 | e | le | role | êro | eśjêfʼ | etuxęť | |
7 | mą | lmą | romą | moro | maňjêfʼ | motuxęť | |
8 | ða | lða | rôða | ðaro | ðejêfʼ | ðatuxęť | |
9 | ňjêl | lňjêl | roňjêl | ňiro | ňľjêfʼ | ňituxęť | |
10 | (ke)ro | lro | rôtuxęť | ||||
100 | (ke)jêfʼ | lъjêfʼ | jêfʼtuxęť | ||||
1000 | tuxęť | lduxęť | tuxęť by itself is a noun; however, lduxęť and ketuxęť are adjectives. |
Finite verbs in Mavakhalan consist of these morphemes in this order:
The only non-finite verbal form was the participle/gerund which was not marked for mood, voice, aspect, or number, using the suffix -êję, which displaced any final vowel while preserving palatalisation. As a noun, it has the stem -êjen-, and possessive markers were used to indicate the subject, for example, ðazêjenako for their fighting, or nonêjenej for my going. The 3sg participle -êjenaka and the 3pl -êjenako are extremely common and are sometimes abbreviated to -êjęka and -êjęko respectively in poetry in order to fit the meter, and in colloquial speech it is sometimes further abbreviated to just -êję.
Deverbal nouns were formed by taking the bare verbal stem and treating it as a noun.
Seven capital conjugation classes are recognised:
Additionally, five caudal conjugation classes are recognised:
Mavakhalan inherited the modal prefixes of Adāta in its entirety, though the negative benefactive and negative obligative had fallen together in some environments due to voicing assimilation.
conson. | nasal | vocalic | w-voc. | w-cons. | j-cons. | j-voc. | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No prefix | Ø- | w- | Ø- | j- | ||||
Affirmative | ||||||||
Indicative | ro- | r- | row- | rov- | roj- | verbs beginning in /i u/ take ro-, hence roipe, not **ripe; verbs beginning in /a ɔ/ mutate to /ɔ o/, hence rope, not **rape, and rôto, not **roto. | ||
Imperative | i- | je- | ij- | iw- | iǵ- | i- | ij- | |
Optative | rou- | rowo- | rovk- | rowôk- | rowôč- | |||
Benefactive | roza- | roz- | roź- | |||||
Obligative | so- | s- | ś- | |||||
Antibenefactive | roira- | roir- | roirʼ- | |||||
Conditional | ropu- | ropo- | ropaz- | ropaź- | ||||
Negative | ||||||||
Indicative | ą- | a- | m- | mʼ- | ||||
Imperative | mi- | mje- | mij- | miw- | miǵ- | mi- | mij- | verbs beginning in /i/ drop the /ij/ from the prefix, hence mima not **miima. |
Optative | mu- | mo- | mg- | môk- | môč- | |||
Benefactive | ąza- | ąz- | ąź- | |||||
Obligative | ąso- | ąs- | ąś- | |||||
Antibenefactive | mira- | mir- | mirʼ- | |||||
Conditional | ąpu- | ąpo- | ąpaz- | ąpaź- |
Although Mavakhalan inherited the infixed passive voice of Adāta, a new passive form had developed from compound verbs with ovl(a)- (to take). This "compound" passive is marginally more functional than the infixed passive: it can form participles/gerunds and deverbal nouns, whereas the infixed passive may not. Early Mavakhalan tends to use both passives, while late Mavakhalan shows a clear preference for the compound passive.
Additionally, a causative had developed along the same model from compound verbs with þaz(a)- (to make, to do), and a passive-permissive with safʼ- (to give).
There is a small set of irregular verbs with two stems. The stem alternation arises from differences in the voicing pattern of weak vowels, whereby every other weak vowel in a consecutive sequence of weak vowels drops. In traditional terms, the stems are called strong and weak, and each of the voice/aspect/number markers is considered either strong or weak. One such irregular verb is fazôs- (to remove), and its paradigm is as follows:
conson. | palatal | e- | a- | o- | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Active voice | ||||||
Habitual sg | -Ø | -Ø | -e | -a | -o | strong |
Aorist sg | -ę | -ję | -ę | -ą | -ǫ | strong |
Imperfective sg | -ôś | -jêś | -eś | -aś | -oś | weak |
Habitual pl | -ôš | -jêš | -eš | -aš | -oš | weak |
Aorist pl | -ve | -ve | -eve | -ave | -ove | strong |
Imperfective pl | -u | -i | -ê | -o | -ô | weak |
Passive voice | ||||||
Habitual sg | -ôl | -jêl | -el | -al | -ol | weak |
Aorist sg | -ona | -jena | -ena | -ona | -ona | strong |
Imperfective sg | -uś | -iś | -êś | -oś | -ôś | weak |
Habitual pl | -uš | -iš | -êš | -oš | -ôš | weak |
Aorist pl | -uve | -ive | -êve | -ove | -ôve | weak |
Imperfective pl | -uwa | -ija | -êa | -oa | -ôa | weak |
Although the basic Mavakhalan word order is subject verb object, compounds are head-first, a relic of the original VSO word order of Ndak Ta.
Verbs were a closed class in Mavakhalan, as evidenced by the relative poverty of dependent-incorporation in verbs and verb-forming processes in general.
The basic Mavakhalan word order is subject verb object, though this is somewhat oversimplified. Adverbial phrases are in the order place manner time. A more detailed analysis shows that Mavakhalan in fact has an underlying VSO word order, but mandatory topic fronting means that the verb always ends up in the second position. This is similar to Ayāsth, however, Ayāsth has only optional topic fronting, which allows the verb to still be in the first position.
Mavakhalan has several prepositions, most of which take noun phrases as their complement, though some have a more restricted field and only take non-finite verb (gerund) phrases (denoted nvp). Some prepositions take finite verb phrases (denoted fvp) instead of non-finite verb phrases.
All prepositions govern the accusative case and are proclitics.
particle | with noun phrases | complem. | with verb phrases | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Benefactive | zô | i.e. for (the benefit/detriment of) ... | nvp | i.e. in order to ..., indicates a means-end relationship. |
Essive | jêv | i.e. as ..., being ... | nvp, fvp | i.e. as ..., implies imperfective aspect with nvp; may indicate a correlative relationship. |
Inessive | nê | i.e. in ..., both spatially and temporally. | nvp | i.e. while (in the middle of) ..., implies imperfective aspect. |
Adessive | ov | i.e. around ..., on ..., both spatially and temporally. | nvp | i.e. while ..., implies aorist aspect. |
Abessive | al | i.e. without ... | nvp, fvp | i.e. without ..., implies habitual aspect. |
Instrumental | ate | i.e. with ..., using ... | nvp | i.e. by ..., implies habitual aspect; indicates a means-end or action-result relationship. |
Vialis | rafe | i.e via ..., along ... | nvp | i.e. by ..., implies aorist aspect; indicates a means-end or action-result relationship. |
Ablative | ha | i.e. from ... | nvp | i.e. after ..., implies aorist aspect; indicates the complement occurs before the main clause and may indicate an action-result relationship. |
Allative-dative | ila | i.e. to ..., towards ... | nvp | i.e. to ..., towards ..., implies imperfective aspect; indicates an action-goal relationship. |
Illative | aþa | i.e. into ... | ||
Terminative | axêrʼ | i.e. as far as ..., until ..., both spatially and temporally. | nvp, fvp | i.e. until ..., indicates that the main clause holds as long as the complement holds true. |
Comparative | neze | i.e. than ..., indicates the standard of comparison. | ||
Comitative | pę | i.e. (together) with ... | nvp, fvp | i.e. and ..., implies habitual aspect with nvp; indicates the complement occurs concurrently with the main clause. |
Antecedental | za | nvp, fvp | i.e. after ..., indicates the complement occurs before the main clause. | |
Contemporal | hola | nvp, fvp | i.e. when ..., indicates the complement occurs simultaneously with the main clause. | |
Subsequential | ilan | nvp, fvp | i.e. before ..., indicates the complement occurs after the main clause. | |
Coordinative | ǫ | nvp, fvp | i.e. and ..., forms a simple coordinate clause; the non-clitic particle ǫś was used at the beginning of a sentence with a fvp. |
The noun phrase consists of several constituents:
A noun phrase was turned into a genitive phrase by adding the genitive prefix onto the first component of the noun phrase, be it a quantifier, demonstrative or the head noun itself. Other prepositional phrases were formed by adding a particle to the front of the noun phrase.
For example, let us consider the complex prepositional phrase ila-ezę xo mezeko pera aźðefʼ azê la ðazêjenako zô-o:
to all of those brave fathers of the children of this land of Kāxad who are fighting for them
A preposition may only take one complement, so to construct a prepositional phrase with multiple complements, the preposition was repeated before each complement and each non-initial preposition took the proclitic ǫ-. For example, ila-śmezeo ǫ-ila-śjêmʼno for to the fathers and mothers.
The verb phrase consists of these constituents:
Any one of those constituents except the verb may be fronted to first position, but only in the main clause. Dependent clauses did not undergo topic fronting.
The single copula in Adāta was abandoned in Mavakhalan and replaced with a set of verbs:
The difference between ape- and źma- was that the former had more fleeting and temporary connotations.
A nominal was predicated with the essive preposition jêv:
Sinakan lived as the king of Kāxad. ⇔ Sinakan was the king of Kāxad.
An adjective was predicated with the instrumental preposition ate or the abessive preposition al:
From the death of my father, the nearby kingdoms have existed with hostility. ⇔ From the death of my father, the nearby kingdoms have been hostile.
With stupidity sits not the enemy. ⇔ Stupid, the enemy is not.
The enemy lives without stupidity. ⇔ The enemy is not stupid.
The fact that subject pronouns could be omitted facilitated a kind of serial verb construct:
He took bread and came to the feast.
Note the use of a pronominal object after the second verb:
I captured prisoners and oxen and sheep and sent them to the land of Kāxad.
Similar syntax was also used for some constructs using auxiliary verbs with other finite verbs:
I have conquered my enemies. (perfect of result, present tense)
Possibly by analogy, in late Mavakhalan, serial verb constructs of the first kind were also expressed a single verbal phrase with a cluster of finite verbs:
I captured and sent prisoners and oxen and sheep to the land of Kāxad.
In some cases, the coordinating conjunction was omitted in clustering:
He brought bread to the feast.
Compare an equivalent sentence using a compound verb:
He brought bread to the feast.
The key difference between the serial verb cluster construct and the auxiliary verb construct it was based on was that the latter could still be analysed as being a sequence of two verbal phrases, whereas the latter can not: for example, in the second example, ňða (bread) cannot possibly be the argument of rôtǫ (to go), while ila-śjązoť (to the feast) cannot be the argument of rôvlą (to take) - it is difficult to analyse this as two verbal phrases without positing verb displacement. Furthermore, the verbs in a serial verb cluster always shared the same aspect and mood, whereas an auxiliary verb may have a different aspect and/or mood to the main verb.
źnaką, źmêjenaka jêv-žzakǫ xezor, ǫ-jêv-śjąžzaka aźnla akoxaðą, ǫ-jêv-śjênmêka azama ǫ-aþolǫ, rovʼ śjêś:
“ilan rope jê ov-źnôpokoťja aśjênmezej, roirapê eze śjêžzakalaso rula ate-hêkǫ ila-ję. śjêžzakalasa rula kas rovʼve śjêś: “źmezeka roźmą jêv-žzakǫ pero. a roirahofją śižzakala aśijakoranaka. ǫś rotą a jêv-nakǫ. ðal rozapeś a apêjenaka ov-źnôpokoťja aśjênmezeka jêv-ðefją.”
“hola rope jê, źmêjenej jêv-śjênmêka azama ǫ-aþolǫ, ov-źnôpokoťja aśjênmezej, ilan rononą jê aþa-śjąžzakala rula apêjenako ate-hêkǫ ila-ję, rozanoną jê ila-śizoť axofej. jê rozamʼzokǫ o ǫ-rohavapą jê tonej ila-źnômʼnǫ malêjenaka. jê rovję śjêś: “eðačjej, źmêjenoðo jêv-śjąxen aśizê, śjêžzakalaso kas rovfonafano ję ate-papazêjenako ję jêv-ðefją. ǫś rosoteve o pasêjenako śjąkola aźnlaðôďnoðo, eðačjej! ijenazapa śijaðôďno!”
“ofej roraþǫ śilezê aśjênmavoj. a rovlą ję ǫ-rosafję a vafor zô-źňjêťjanej. jê ropeþą o mukêjenako ję nê-loð kero. i ropeþave o. jê rovъję ojoťijo ǫ ovuwo ǫ oxoro ǫ-ropʼlazą jê o ila-źnla akoxað.”
ǫś rovśjêś otoiľ ate-ezę vaforaka. ðal rotêjoś moðonona hesômðaka ate-optej jêv-rovśjêś rovśjêś otoiľ. ǫś rosafʼpeþą a. ha-atêjenaka romalaś zama ate-ġraǫ, ǫ-rofazôsę aġmoðonona hesômðaka al-zoma.
śjêś ropeþona otoiľ ha-zamǫ ǫ-rosafjavję źmêję azama jêv-jêmavafor.